Revelations 3:1-13

Posted Posted in Sunday School

With being sick on Saturday, this feels more like a lesson I sucked out of my thumb, but hopefully still edifying… Sorry, less formatting as well.

******

I feel like I really missed out in having not been here the last 2 Sundays. Would havebeen really interesting to hear what was discussed.

This section on addressing the churches is super practical. Feels like we could spend the whole lesson on any one phrase, but I would like to try to work our way through most of the text I hope.

Sardis

A fascinating picture of a dying church. Sometimes I wish we could have known the churches he spoke of personally. Many authors feel Jesus’ address to the seven churches here was specifically to those churches, but also were representative of all the churches, both then and now. If so, it makes me thoughtful which church Weavertown would be most like. Part of me is like, we are doing pretty good here, and part of me is scared to know what Jesus would really say about me and the church here.

 

Angel: did you at all discuss what the significance is of addressing the churches through their angel?

 

Jesus’ title: Represents his divinity/control (“has” the Holy Spirit), and control of the churches (stars), specifically Sardis.

 

The church at Sardis was so dead that Jesus skipped his usual praise/reproof formula. In this case, the works he commended them for were actually their biggest weakness. They thought they were alive but were actually dead. Perhaps Jesus was referencing the famous cemetery outside the city where many famous kings had been buried.

 

What were Jesus’ accusations of the church of Sardis ?

  • dead/sleeping (1, 3)
  • wake up and strengthen what remains/is about to die
  • incomplete works
  • Remember what you received and heard, and keep it (were not apparently)

 

A similar list: What were his commands to the church?

  • Wake up
  • Strengthen what remains
  • Remember
  • Keep it
  • Repent

 

Finally, what did Jesus say he would do:

  • I will come like a thief (if you don’t wake up),
  • I will come against you
  • Implies that he will blot out the dead people from the book of life (5)

 

Ok, let’s back up and discuss some of those points a bit. First of all, what was the substance of what Jesus was reproving them for? I think the idea of being dead/sleeping is probably the key idea to this church.

 

First of all, what is meant by the picture of death and sleeping?

Maybe death is a person who has fallen away from grace enough he is no longer a Christian. He is no longer listening to the Holy Spirit. Maybe the outside still looks pretty good? I think sleeping implies that the person is still a Christian, but in a stupor and not listening well, if at all to the Holy Spirit. Maybe I’m splitting hairs here, but I think Christ’s command is to the sleepers, not the corpses, if you will. Jesus also complained that their works were incomplete. I’m not sure what that means. It seems like works are a result of what is in the heart??

 

Going on to Jesus’ commands, how do you wake up like he commanded? Jesus also said to remember what you received and heard. Probably they go together. “If you love me, you will keep my commandments.” (John 14:15). Is obedience what they were missing? They weren’t paying attention to what they knew to do and thereby fell asleep? I think we just really need reminders of what God expects of us or we get sloppy. (Is sloppy obedience really that big a deal?) Sometimes when I try to evaluate some of our practices at Weavertown that our more unique to Christendom, like say, no jewelry, I hear Satan’s words in the back of my head–hath God really said?

 

Crux of command revolves around repentance. Very similar to most of the other churches. What is repentance?

 

Jesus states he will come like a thief if they do not wake up. This must be referring to judgment on their church. It is probably also referring to Jesus’ descriptions of his return in the gospels. Sardis had also been captured twice by a “thief”. 2 Peter 3 talks about Christ’s return as impetus for godly living.

 

Encouragement: There just a few true believers left, who had not soiled their garments and were worthy to be with Jesus in glory. This seems like a different metaphor–not soiling their robes instead of being dead/sleeping. Is he talking about something different, or is being dead/sleeping the same thing as being dirty?

 

Promise to the conquerors: salvation, confess his name before my Father/angels. Seems to be basically the same promise. Why did he give this promise to this church????

 

Let him hear… no doubt we have a tendency to not pay attention to this warning.

 

Philadelphia:

Almost complete opposite to Sardis–No reproof at all.

 

Jesus’ title: Philadelphia and Smyrna are the only two churches with no rebuke, and it is interesting that both were under severe threat from a powerful Jewish presence in the city. Therefore, the names of Christ chosen here reflect that situation and reassure the beleaguered Philadelphia Christians that the Messiah is indeed on their side, not on the side of the “synagogue of Satan” (3: 9). Osborne, Kindle Location 4462

 

As much as we appreciate our religious freedom here in the United States, I think it is deadly to our spirituality.

 

I know your works… Jesus’ affirmation section starts with a promise.

His decision will be final. When he “opens” the New Jerusalem (to the Gentiles), no one can change that decision. When he “closes” the door (to these Jews), this decision also cannot be altered. Osborne, Kindle Locations 4490-4491

 

A key feature of the church of Philadelphia was faithfulness:

  • You have little power yet have kept my word/not denied my name (8)
  • Kept my word about patient endurance (10)
  • Hold fast to what you have (command, 11). Even though this church was doing much better, spiritually, then Sardis, it was given a very similar command to hold fast.
  • I think this is a key take away from this entire section on the letters to the churches as it is consistently alluded to in each letter (e.g. to the one who overcomes).
  • This is one of the fruits of the Spirit. How do we cultivate a heart of faithfulness in discouraging circumstances?

 

God will punish those who are persecuting his church (9). I think an acute awareness of God’s justice makes it so much easier for us as his children to focus on love and forgiveness. (Romans 12, 13; Timothy Keller, I think this episode: http://podbay.fm/show/352660924/e/1424299640?autostart=1)

 

Bowing at your feet…

The passage alludes to Isa. 60: 14, “The sons of your oppressors will come bowing before you; all who despise you will bow down at your feet” (cf. also Isa. 2: 3; 14: 2; 45: 14; 49: 23; Ezek. 36: 23; Zech. 8: 20– 23).[ 15] The OT taught that the Gentiles would be forced to pay homage to the Jews at the eschaton, and now this promise is turned on its head: Jewish oppressors would be forced to pay homage to Gentile believers. Osborne, Kindle Locations 4551-4554

Although this feels foreign to me as a Matthew 5 Christian, I think this is consistent with the concept that we will be judges with God at the end of the world.

 

Protection: V 10 seems to be a promise for protection from God’s coming wrath at the end of the world.

 

V 11 ff: Return of Christ. This is the first of 4 times his return is mentioned in the letters to the churches in which it is a positive. Since they were being faithful, his return would mean vindication and reward instead of judgment.

 

Revelations 1 part 2 Study Guide

Posted Posted in Sunday School

Since didn’t really get much past v. 4 last Sunday, I will continue from there. The first section is mostly pasted from last week’s study guide, but with a few additions. Unfortunately, this is mostly commentary, as in, my processing the content behind the language here.  However, what is the big picture here of this lesson? What are the take-aways for Weavertown? I need more time to think about that, hopefully before Sunday…  I do think this is a very powerful description of Jesus in his glorified state.  Our response should be like John’s–falling down at his feet! (Worship and hope).

  • Verses 4-8: Again–JESUS! Jesus is a central theme of Revelation.  I tend to think of Jesus as tender, meek and mild and forget he is the rider on the white horse who will judge the nations with a rod of iron!! Nowhere else in the NT do we really get a glimpse of awesome divinity of Jesus like this.  I think worship is a key task for us for our study of Revelation!  Let’s take a look at the different attributes listed of Jesus:
  • Grace and Peace: This can only be given by someone who can extend grace and create peace.
  • From him who is and who was and who is to come (repeated v. 8 and elsewhere): besides affirming God’s eternal nature, this is a declaration that He is in control of past, present and future, in spite of evil having a heyday in the present.
  • Vs 4-5 is also a fascinating reference to each member of the Trinity.
  • There is much debate over why the Spirit is referred to as seven, but probably a reference to perfection.
  • Jesus is the faithful witness, the firstborn from the dead, the ruler of the kings on earth.
    • Probably way more significance than this, but to the persecuted church, Jesus was emphasizing that he had been through the same things they had, and he was in control of their enemies–death and kings.
  • Vs 5b-6: a Doxology TO Jesus. What a powerful list of his loving work on behalf of His Bride, the church! There is not nearly enough time in one SS lesson to even begin to cover these verses.
    • 1 Peter 1:18-19 18 knowing that you were ransomed from the futile ways inherited from your forefathers, not with perishable things such as silver or gold, 19 but with the precious blood of Christ, like that of a lamb without blemish or spot.
    • Exodus 19:5-6 5 Now therefore, if you will indeed obey my voice and keep my covenant, you shall be my treasured possession among all peoples, for all the earth is mine; 6 and you shall be to me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation. These are the words that you shall speak to the people of Israel.”
    • Again, to the hearts of those suffering for the name of Christ–what a reassurance to be reminded of His work and know that he has made us his kingdom and priests!
    • What is the significance of priests? (direct access to God and task of representing Him)
    • What should our response be his work? (PRAISE!)
  • V 7: coming with the clouds–echoes Dan 7:13 and Matt 24:30:
    • Daniel 7:13-14 13 “I saw in the night visions, and behold, with the clouds of heaven there came one like a son of man, and he came to the Ancient of Days and was presented before him. 14 And to him was given dominion and glory and a kingdom, that all peoples, nations, and languages should serve him; his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom one that shall not be destroyed.
    • Matthew 24:30-31 30 Then will appear in heaven the sign of the Son of Man, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. 31 And he will send out his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.
  • Even those who pierced him…will wail. This reference to Zech 12:10ff where the house of Israel will mourn over the one they have pierced.  10 “And I will pour out on the house of David and the inhabitants of Jerusalem a spirit of grace and pleas for mercy, so that, when they look on me, on him whom they have pierced, they shall mourn for him, as one mourns for an only child, and weep bitterly over him, as one weeps over a firstborn.
    • Perhaps this wailing/mourning is implying a recognition of crucifying their prince. Perhaps mourning in repentance? Perhaps fear of coming judgment?
    • Or perhaps all of the above are intended by the ambiguity–certainly all are appropriate responses.  Reminds me of the declaration in Phil 2 that every knee will bow to Jesus some day.  Every eye will see His return and finally recognize Him for who he truly is.
  • Common theme is that Jesus’ return is with glory and power. The Jesus we see in Revelation is now King of kings!
  • Alpha and Omega/is/was/is to come/Almighty. This idea of God’s eternity displays his control of everything, in this context especially the end of the world and bringing judgment.

*************

  • I, John, your brother and partner in the tribulation…
    • Hauck calls [endurance] the “basic attitude of the righteous” in the  OT and later Judaism. (Osborne, Kindle Locations 2177-2179).
    • The Christian’s John was writing to needed to be reminded to persevere in the face of tribulation. This is a major theme of Revelation (cf. each of the letters to the churches).
  • John was exiled on the Isle of Patmos, not that far from Ephesus.
  • I was in the Spirit… This phrase is used 4 times in Revelation (1: 10; 4: 2; 17: 3; 21: 10).  Probably most significant as a “literary device to point to the apocalyptic nature of the visions” (Osborne, Kindle Location 2211).
  • On the Lord’s Day… Yoder argues that this did not mean Sunday but the Day of the Lord.  Osborne counters by showing that the Greek term for Day of the Lord does not match what John wrote here.  He prefers to interpret this as Sunday. This terminology for Sunday became common right after the time of this writing.
  • Voice like a trumpet is significant. Almost always in the NT is used to refer to harbinger of the day of the Lord or a theophany–probably both innuendos were intended (Osborne, Kindle Location 2250).
  • The church(es) as lampstands: Probably the main point of the metaphor is that the church is “a shining light for God in the midst of a hostile world” (Osborne, Kindle Location 2307)
  • Christ was in the midst of the lampstands–probably signifying his presence and support during their trials.
  • One like a son of man: generally agreed by commentators that it literally means “humanlike”, but the significance of that meaning is highly debated. This is a strong reference to Daniel 7. Osborne argues “the ‘son of man’ image in Daniel, the Gospels, and Revelation was a messianic figure with a  divine overtones” (Osborne, Kindle Location 2343).
  • Description of Christ: Do you think this is literally how Jesus looked, or were these more like prophetic pictures describing his power and glory? Osborne argues more of the latter. He says these eight attributes are images drawn from the OT.
    • Long robe and golden sash. Possibly referring to garb of the priest. Could also signify his position as rulers of the day wore sashes across the chest (not at the waist as ordinary people).
    • White head and hair: indicated wisdom and years of experience. Also reinforces that Jesus is part of the Godhead as this is a metaphor for God in Dan 7:9.
    • Blazing Eyes: (Dan 10:6) divine insight
    • Shining metal feet: “since feet in the ancient world portrayed the direction of one’s life, the image here depicts Christ’s life in both its strength or stability and it’s absolute purity” (Osborne, Kindle Location 2397).
    • Powerful Voice: (Ezek 1:24) image of power and strength
    • Stars in His Right Hand: Right hand symbolizes power and authority.  He controlled the stars (symbol of authority/divinity?)
    • Sword from His Mouth: (Isa 11:4)probably reference to judgment. Compares to the idea of slaying the wicked/antichrist with the breath of his mouth.
    • Brilliant Face: (Sinai, Ps 84:11, etc) attribute of Yahweh. Revealed glory.
  • Falling before the exalted Christ is proper response. Perhaps also heralds what everyone will do some day (Phil 2). However, John did not stay there (he obeyed and was told not to fear).
  • Laid his Right hand on me: symbolizes commissioning.
  • Vs 17-20: not sure why Jesus repeats a lot of the things John already mentioned,  but definitely shows that Jesus is glorified and in charge. John is also clearly being commissioned to communicate the message of Revelation to the church.

Revelations 1:1-8 Study Guide

Posted Posted in Sunday School

Ok, well this got pretty long winded, but it introduces a lot of major topics in understanding Revelation. Hope this helps you think well about this book of Scripture.  Also, I reserve the right to change my mind on some issues as I study and the Lord gives me deeper insight 🙂

Intro

      • How do you feel about studying Revelations? Or maybe a better question is, how would you feel about being asked to teach the book? Here are a few of my thoughts:
        • It looked very daunting to me because I have hardly any background.  I have read little, studied little, and heard few teaching/sermons. So I have to do a lot of study to feel educated enough to speak about it.
        • There is probably more debate about the interpretation of Revelations than most Bible books, especially the NT.  I think this is a big part of why it looks scary to teach it.  I think humility will be a crucial ingredient for fostering an actual learning environment in this class.
          • Osborne, Kindle Location 808: Thus in interpreting the symbols of the book, we first need the “hermeneutics of humility” to realize we “see things imperfectly as in a poor mirror” (1 Cor. 13: 8 NLT). We are to center on the purpose of the text and note the theological thrust, leaving what will actually happen with God.
        • One answer to this trepidation is to review Revelation 1:3. The blessing for being internalizing this book is very clear.  (more later). My grandpa used to say, it says blessed are those who read/hear–not who understand it.
      • Another reason it feels like such a hard book to teach is because there are so many symbolic events depicted (e.g. story of the dragon and the woman).  What really was God trying to convey with that vision? Was a dragon literally trying to eat the baby, or is this just a symbol?
        • I think it’s important to distinguish between literal and physical since we earth dwellers often confuse the two (literal means it actually occurred; physical means it happened in the physical realm).
        • It is likely that God has chosen esoteric symbols from the common store of apocalyptic symbols in the first century in order to turn the reader away from exactly what he is going to do and toward the theological meaning of how he is going to do it. We do not know what is going to happen behind the pictures of locust plagues, meteor showers, volcanic eruptions, and horrible storms. Some may happen literally, many will not. It is important to realize that we know no more about the second coming than Jesus’ Jewish disciples did about the first. They too thought they were reading the Scriptures rightly. (Osborne, Kindle Location 803).  (Osborne has a lot more interesting things to say about how to understand a book like Revelation.)
        • Addendum after teaching the class: I think in a book like Revelation, it can be easy to miss the forest for the trees.  It can be easy to get so hung up on the details we don’t understand that we miss the obvious and important ones.
      • Interpretive models of Revelations: I can hardly proceed without giving a quick primer on the 5 families of interpretive models of Revelations.  I think a bit of framework will help you understand both Scripture and your own bias towards Revelations. I STRONGLY encourage you to review the article by Greg Herrick regarding interpretive models.  Models for Interpreting Revelations (Wildly Generalized)
      • A very simple outline of the whole book by Osborne (Kindle Location 1516)
        1. Prologue (1: 1– 8)
        2. Churches Addressed (1: 9– 3: 22)
        3. God in Majesty and Judgment (4: 1– 16: 21)
        4. Final Judgment at the Arrival of the Eschaton 17: 1– 20: 15)
        5. New Heaven and New Earth (21: 1– 22: 5)
        6. Epilogue (22: 6– 21)

Lesson

      • V 1: The Revelation…
        • Quick question, what is the name of the last book of the Bible (it’s actually Revelation–not Revelations, plural)
      • The Greek word for Revelation is apocalypse. Some scholars use the title apocalypse interchangeably with Revelation.
        • A side note, but apocalyptic literature is an actual genre of books of the day. Knowing this is helpful when trying to do a (in depth) study of Revelation.
      • 4 step process of Revelation (Yoder). God > Jesus Christ > angel > John > God’s bondservants.
        • This is the Revelation of Jesus Christ.
        • V 2: It is reliable (John bore witness)
        • The author is John. Some debate on which John, but best evidence if for the apostle John. It is worth noting one argument that frequently listed is that the writing style is so different from the apostle John’s other writings.  The canonicity of Revelation was questioned in the early church, so there are less extant manuscripts and more textual variants.  Osborne argues (and I agree), that the solecisms (e.g. unusual grammar/allusions to OT terms) were John’s way of highlighting an important truth (Kindle location 989).  Nonetheless, this is pertinent to serious study of Revelations because John’s grammar has led astray a lot of well-meaning people.
      • The content of the Revelation–The events listed will take place soon (1c, 3c). This informs our model of interpreting Revelation.  It is also pertinent that God’s version of “soon” is not synonymous with humans, and that this language is similar to other NT language referring to the Jesus’ 2nd coming (Yoder).
        • Osborne says this is an allusion to Daniel 2:28 (implying this is the end spoken of there). The imminent end of history is a constant theme in the  NT and is at the heart of the Book of Revelation. (Osborne, Kindle Location 1616)
      • V3: Reader and Heeder: as I mentioned earlier, there are very specific commands for the church in regard for what to do with this Revelation from Jesus. If you forget everything else from today, remember this verse!! Read (aloud), hear, keep. Also, implied to remember it (for the time is near).
        • Reader: this was referring probably primarily to the tradition of having official readings of Scripture in worship services (think our readings before the message, or as part of the worship).  One of the most important ideas that give me is that we should be using Revelation more often for our worship services!
        • Hear: this is an extension of the previous thought–primarily referring to the worshipers who were paying attention during the services as the book was read.
        • Heeder: keep what is written in it.  Are there commands in the book of Revelation? I would have thought of it more as a prophecy book, and not realize that it contains commands for the church today. But whatever we learn from this book, we must always be keeping a sharp eye out for the instruction for us.
      • To the seven churches: why did John/Jesus pick these seven churches specifically?
        • Therefore, John deliberately chose to address these particular seven churches but intended them to typify all the other churches (see “what the Spirit says to the churches” in 2: 7, 11, etc., with the plural meant to include all churches). (Osborne, Kindle Locations 1738)
        • This means this message applies to us as well.
        • Good time to point out that the context of Revelation was to the suffering church.  It was to give hope!  Likely written around 90 AD during reign of Domitian, although time of Nero is also possible.  Imperial cult (worship of the Emperor) was prominent.

Verses 4-8: JESUS! Jesus is a central theme of Revelation.  I tend to think of Jesus as tender, meek and mild and forget he is the rider on the white horse who will judge the nations with a rod of iron!! Nowhere else in the NT do we really get a glimpse of awesome divinity of Jesus like this.  I think worship is a key task for us for our study of Revelation!  Let’s take a look at the different attributes listed of Jesus:

    • Grace and Peace: This can only be given by someone who can extend grace and create peace.
    • From him who is and who was and who is to come (repeated v. 8 and elsewhere): besides affirming Jesus’ eternal nature, this is a declaration that He is in control of past, present and future, in spite of evil having a heyday in the present.
    • Reference to the Holy Spirit underscores the Trinity.
    • Jesus is the faithful witness, the firstborn from the dead, the ruler of the kings on earth.
      • Probably way more significance than this, but to the persecuted church, Jesus was emphasizing that he had been through the same things they had, and he was in control of their enemies–death and kings.
    • Vs 5b-6: a Doxology TO Jesus. What a powerful list of his loving work on behalf of His Bride, the church! There is not nearly enough time in one SS lesson to even begin to cover these verses.
      • Again, to the hearts of those suffering for the name of Christ–what a reassurance to be reminded of His work and know that he has made us his kingdom and priests!
      • What is the significance of priests? (direct access to God and task of representing Him)
    • V 7: coming with the clouds (Dan 7:13 and Matt 24:30). Even those who pierced him (reference to Zech 12:10.  Again, a major theme of Revelation is Jesus’ return with glory and power.
    • Alpha and Omega. As previously stated, this idea of God’s eternity displays his control of everything, in this context especially the end of the world and bringing judgment.

Revelations…where to start?

Posted Posted in Sunday School

So I am trying to think about how to get started thinking about Revelations.  There are so many opinions to wade through, and seemingly so deeply held, too.

I just bought the Kindle version of Osborne’s commentary on Revelations. According to the reviews, Osborne takes an eclectic approach with some weight towards futuristic model.

This post by Ligonier Ministries explains the basic viewpoints (interpretive models) for understanding the book of Revelations, as does this post by Greg Herrick.  It was helpful for me to hear descriptions about the interpretive models most people use for understanding Revelations.  I think its important to be self-aware of your own explanatory model for a book like this.

I would love to hear your opinions on how to think about understanding Revelations.

Proverbs 12:15-28 Study Guide

Posted Posted in Sunday School

Verses 17-20, 22 talk mostly about words so I would like to focus most of our time on discussing the topics regarding what we say.

15 The way of a fool is right in his own opinion, but the one who listens to advice is wise.

Already kinda covered verse 15 last week.  However, I don’t remember talking very much about that first line.  I just want to point out what that first phrase is saying (The way of the fools is right in his own opinion). In other words, a fool will think he is right.  The opposite would be to say a wise man will know he doesn’t know everything.  I think this is a fascinating concept. Often in a discussion, the people talking the most and the loudest are really the least knowledgeable about what they are arguing about.  The wisest people I know are consistently up front about what they don’t know.   This is something I want to grow more in, but I hope in my teaching Sunday School class, you have consistently heard me say, this is what I think, or this is how it looks to me, instead of being dogmatic and saying THIS IS HOW IT IS!

16 A fool’s annoyance is known at once, but the prudent overlooks an insult.

This is interesting to me because I keep trying to teach Ian that control of his own emotions and responses is something he needs to learn. He just may not punch Kedrick whenever he loses his temper.  Control of your emotions is a major task of adulthood. Uncontrolled people that go into adulthood and responsibility are terrifying loose cannons. I want to say this respectfully, but one need look no farther than our president for an example.

17 The faithful witness tells what is right, but a false witness speaks deceit.

I’m not sure if I even know what v 17 is saying. ESV and KJV sound pretty different on the first phrase, but I think are actually saying almost the same thing.  So it’s just saying a false witness will tell the truth and a false witness with deceive you (?!).  I’m confused about the significance of that. Isn’t that the definition of a false witness–one that speaks deceit?

18 Speaking recklessly is like the thrusts of a sword, but the words of the wise bring healing.

I think probably all of us have been the victim of a reckless tongue.  No doubt it was quite destructive!  Maybe some of you still feel the pain from words a parent or close acquaintance spoke to you years ago.  But isn’t the challenge to remember the destruction we can cause when we are on the giving end of the tongue? Many of us are fathers and leaders and I think have extra responsibility to be thoughtful in our words. The second half of the verse explains how the wise brings healing through what he says. That is the challenge for us. We can destroy or heal with our words. V25 is another way of phrasing that.  I don’t get to see my boss that often because of the nature of my job.  Recently, she gave me public recognition at a staff meeting and it was just amazing how encouraging it was for me to get some praise from her.

Can you relate stories of being pierced with reckless words?

Can you give examples of how a wise word brought healing to you?

What are your strategies for watching your words?

Do you find it a challenge as a father/leader to consistently build up instead of tearing down?

Eph 4:14 so that we may no longer be children, tossed to and fro by the waves and carried about by every wind of doctrine, by human cunning, by craftiness in deceitful schemes. 15 Rather, speaking the truth in love, we are to grow up in every way into him who is the head, into Christ,

This verse shows that we need people who can use constructive words for the body of Christ to become mature.

19 The one who tells the truth will endure forever, but the one who lies will last only for a moment.

What is v 19 saying? Is this just a statement that lying will destroy you? If so, what are the implications? Obviously, as pious Matthew 5 believers, we value honesty pretty highly.  But do we love it? Do we actually hate lying like God does?  V 22 fits well here: The Lord abhors a person who lies, but those who deal truthfully are his delight.

What is it about lying that God hates? Why do you think he delights in those who deal truthfully?

What does it look like to deal truthfully? That seems so much deeper than just not ever telling a lie.

27 The lazy person does not roast his prey, but personal possessions are precious to the diligent.

Obviously you can apply this directly–if you go hunting, better make SURE you get that deer to the butcher’s or you are lazy. But I think the verse is really making a statement about the character of the lazy and the diligent.

Why would the lazy person not roast his game?

Why would the diligent care about his possessions?

How do you teach this to your children?

 

Proverbs 11:1-15 comments 1-29-17

Posted Posted in Sunday School

First of all, Proverbs is hard for me to do a lot of traditional study material on.  It feels like these are more short general truths that should just be discussed in class as we work to internalize.  So I’m not sure I will continue posting a lot on Proverbs for now, but probably some…

Here are a few ideas for this passage:

  • V 1: What is it about measuring devices that either infuriates or delights the Lord?
    • Scriptures that talk about it?
      • Lev 19:35 You shall do no wrong in judgment, in measures of length or weight or quantity.
      • Deu 25:13 You shall not have in your bag two kinds of weights, a large and a small.
  • 2: Pride/humility
    • If you are proud, there is only one way to go (down).   Disgrace…does God perhaps intentionally give the proud extra disgrace?

5 Likewise, you who are younger, be subject to the elders. Clothe yourselves, all of you, with humility toward one another, for God opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble.

  • But why is there wisdom with the humble? Is it correct to say that humility breeds wisdom?
  • Righteous: a prominent theme in this passage (vs 3-11).
    • What does it mean to be righteous? What is righteousness?
      • Synonyms in this passage (ESV): Integrity, upright.  Antonyms: crookedness, treacherous, but mostly wicked/wickedness.

Definitions of Hebrew terms for Righteous and Wicked:

H3477 (UPRIGHT)

ישׁר

yâshâr

yaw-shawr’

From H3474; straight (literally or figuratively): – convenient, equity, Jasher, just, meet (-est), + pleased well right (-eous), straight, (most) upright (-ly, -ness).

 

H6666 (RIGHTEOUSNESS)

צדקה

tsedâqâh

tsed-aw-kaw’

From H6663; rightness (abstractly), subjectively (rectitude), objectively (justice), morally (virtue) or figuratively (prosperity): – justice, moderately, right (-eous) (act, -ly, -ness).

 

H6662 (RIGHTEOUS/JUst)

צדּיק

tsaddı̂yq

tsad-deek’

From H6663; just: – just, lawful, righteous (man).

 

H898 (TRANSGRESSORS)

בּגד

bâgad

baw-gad’

A primitive root; to cover (with a garment); figuratively to act covertly; by implication to pillage: – deal deceitfully (treacherously, unfaithfully), offend, transgress (-or), (depart), treacherous (dealer, -ly, man), unfaithful (-ly, man), X very.

 

H7563 (WICKED)

רשׁע

râshâ‛

raw-shaw’

From H7561; morally wrong; concretely an (actively) bad person: –  + condemned, guilty, ungodly, wicked (man), that did wrong.

Pro 11:3 The integrityH8S38 of the uprightH3477 shall guideH5%8 them: but the perversenessHSS58 of transgressorsH898 shall destroyH7703 them. Pro 11:4 RichesH1952 profitH3276 no tH3808 m the dayH3117 of wrath: but righteousnessH6666 delivereth from death. The righteousnessH6666 of the perfectH8549 shall directH3474 his way:H1870 Pro 11:5 but the wickedH7563 shall fallH5307 by his own wickedness. *-17564 The righteousnessH6666 of the uprightH3477 shall deliverH5337 them: but Pro 11:6 transgressorsH898 shall be taken in their own naughtiness. H Pro 11:7 When a wickedH7563 expectationH8615 shall perish:H6 his and the hopeH8431 of men perisheth.H6 Pro 11: 8 The righteousH6662 is out of trouble, H6869 and the wickedH7563 comethH935 in his stead. *-18478 Pro 11: 9 An with hus mouthH6310 destroyethH his neighbour:H7453 but through knowledgeH1847 shall the justH6662 be delivered. Pro 11:10 When it goeth well with the righteous,H6662 the rejoiceth: and when the wickedH7563 perish, H6 there is shouting. Hr 440 Pro 11:11 By the of the uprightH3477 the cityH7176 is exalted:H but it is overthrownH2C4C by the mouthH63tc of the wicked. H7563
Pro 11:3 The integrityH8S38 of the uprightH3477 shall guideH5%8 them: but the perversenessHSS58 of transgressorsH898 shall destroyH7703 them. Pro 11:4 RichesH1952 profitH3276 no tH3808 m the dayH3117 of wrath: but righteousnessH6666 delivereth from death. The righteousnessH6666 of the perfectH8549 shall directH3474 his way:H1870 Pro 11:5 but the wickedH7563 shall fallH5307 by his own wickedness. *-17564 The righteousnessH6666 of the uprightH3477 shall deliverH5337 them: but Pro 11:6 transgressorsH898 shall be taken in their own naughtiness. H Pro 11:7 When a wickedH7563 expectationH8615 shall perish:H6 his and the hopeH8431 of men perisheth.H6 Pro 11: 8 The righteousH6662 is out of trouble, H6869 and the wickedH7563 comethH935 in his stead. *-18478 Pro 11: 9 An with hus mouthH6310 destroyethH his neighbour:H7453 but through knowledgeH1847 shall the justH6662 be delivered. Pro 11:10 When it goeth well with the righteous,H6662 the rejoiceth: and when the wickedH7563 perish, H6 there is shouting. Hr 440 Pro 11:11 By the of the uprightH3477 the cityH7176 is exalted:H but it is overthrownH2C4C by the mouthH63tc of the wicked. H7563

 

Proverbs 10:1-16 Study Guide

Posted Posted in Sunday School

I’ve never had to teach Proverbs before, and I admit it looks pretty daunting. It feels important to come to some common agreements about how to interpret Proverbs before we jump in.

 

First of all, what section are we in?

  • Proverbs 1-9 start with Proverbs 1:1:

The proverbs of Solomon, son of David, king of Israel… So that section was proverbs of King Solomon.

  • Proverbs 10:1 starts again with The proverbs of Solomon.  However, these seem to be simply a collection of the wise one-liners, so to speak, that were collected while Solomon was king. For example, in my mind’s eye, I picture him passing judgment on a foolish son, then that evening, penning Proverbs 10:1.  As such, most of these verses don’t seem to stick together very well, that is, each wise saying pretty much stands alone.
  • Chapters 25-29 start with the inscription (Proverbs 25:1) that These also are proverbs of Solomon which the men of Hezekiah king of Judah copied.  So basically more of the same, they just weren’t in the “first edition” of Proverbs.
  • Chapter 30 is the wise sayings of Agur the son of Jakeh. The oracle. (Proverbs 30:1).
  • Chapter 31 is The word of King Lemuel. An oracle his mother taught him. (Proverbs 31:1).

 

Context and how to interpret a Proverb:

  • To properly understand and apply one of these wise sayings we will be studying for the next 6 months, I think it’s crucial to remember when and to whom these Proverbs were written.
  • I think it’s pretty self-explanatory that Solomon was the author, and the book was written to Old Testament Jews.
  • God gave Solomon unmatched wisdom, and we know these Proverbs are part of Scripture. So we can safely take them as truth.  (It is true, that in his later years, Solomon somehow turned his back on Wisdom.)
  • God’s covenant with the Old Testament Jews I believe was very different from our New Testament dispensation.  God promised physical blessings and prosperity as his portion of the covenant in exchange for the obedience and undivided loyalty of the Israelites. Most of the narrative portions of the OT graphically illustrate this time and time again.  A graphic example is David and Saul’s conflict with Goliath, or the Philistines in general. However, in the NT, I see very little support for physical prosperity (I’m not saying none!).
  • A crucial task in interpreting and applying Proverbs is to figure out how this wise saying applies to the NT age.  This is a major premise of Anabaptism–that we give precedence to the way of Jesus where it differs from the OT!!!
  • Gary Miller, one of my ministers from Hutchinson, used to say something to the effect that a Proverb is more of a generality about how life should work rather than a definitive statement about how it always works.  I think this concept is very helpful when you look at Proverbs.  Additionally, they tend to just show one side of a coin, but if you put several proverbs together, you might get a more complete picture.
    • For example: Proverbs 10:4 implies that the diligent will get rich. Many Mennonites like this verse and think that poor people are lazy. But what about Proverbs 13:23 that says that The fallow ground of the poor would yield much food, but it is swept away through injustice. So we need to be careful to take each Proverb in the light of other Scripture.
  • Hebrew Poetry: I think it’s also important to have just a basic understanding of Hebrew poetry. What are the defining characteristics of English poetry? (cadence, rhyming words, etc.).
    • Hebrew poetry primarily used rhyming ideas. Almost all of this section of Proverbs utilizes this rhyming device. For example, Proverbs 10:1.  To get the point of the verse, you really need to put both lines together, not that a foolish son will only be a sorrow to his mother.
    • Additionally, when you try to put something in poetry form, I think you tend to trade off a little exactness in exchange for something you can remember. (Just pick up the hymnal and look at the funny language/word order they use.) Obviously, the better you are at rhyming, the more you can mitigate this. But you still have to make all your sentences the same length. In my opinion, a Proverb like this can’t compare in doctrinal weight to a line in Deuteronomy, or to one of Paul’s 3 paragraph run-on sentence.
    • This is not to say that Proverbs aren’t true, but just that you must be aware of the genre as you seek to understand what God was trying to convey in this passage.
  • Summary: the Proverbs are valuable, pithy lines to help us be thoughtful about how the world works but must be evaluated carefully to see how they apply to us NT believers.
  • Note: these are some of my off the cuff thoughts and I would definitely welcome your input to “sharpen my iron”!

Chapter 10:

I hope to do more thinking and studying throughout the week.  However, I am thinking mostly that we can just sort of go through the passage and allow natural discussion about the each proverb.  There is just such a diversity of ideas with such creative wording here that it feels like you really need some time to digest these lines to really get to their heart….

Malachi 4 Study Guide

Posted Posted in Sunday School
  • I think most of this passage might still actually be future.  For me, that makes the passage a lot more complicated.
  • The context is the again the perceived injustice, that is, that the wicked are not being punished nor the righteous blessed.  This concept really starts in the last verse of Chapter 2, and continues through the rest of the book. Chapter 3:16-18 is definitely part of this section…
  • Maybe start by paraphrasing this whole chapter:
    • In the day that God makes up his treasured possession, you will again see the difference in how God treats the righteous and wicked (3:16-18)
    • This will be because the day of judgment is coming. This day of the Lord will make the wicked like stubble in an the oven.  But for the righteous, it will be blessing like the warm rays of the sun. (or you could argue that Jesus is the Sun here.)
    • The righteous will finally rejoice and trample the wicked.
    • Don’t forget the mosaic law–it still applies
    • Elijah: God will send him again before the great and awesome day [of judgment] comes.  His job is to turn the fathers to their children and children to their fathers. But if not, God will curse the land.
  • Now to explain… This day of wrath/blessing must still be future because so far we have not seen the fulfillment of this kind of a day.
    • IMO, this is different from Malachi 3:1, where the messenger comes to prepare the way before the Lord who will suddenly come to his temple. Malachi 3:2 and following must then be referring again to this same great and awful day of the Lord.
  • Why this admonition to remember the mosaic law? (Malachi 4:4)
    • Much of this prophecy is still centuries in the future.  God was reminding the present day Jews to stay faithful to the things they knew.
    • This is a good reminder to us who have a really good revelation (Scripture), but we tend to neglect it’s instruction.
    • Rabbit trail: I think this verse is a really interesting window into how God worked with men to reveal his word (Moses’ law, but the statutes that God commanded him).
  • Now, how to explain this section about Elijah…
    • One possible explanation is that John could have been the Elijah spoken of here, but he was not accepted, so the primary Elijah in view here will come when Jesus comes prior to the Millennial reign. Following is Constable’s exact quote explaining this view:
    • The Lord promised to send His people Elijah the prophet before the great and terrible day of the Lord arrived. An angel later told John the Baptist’s parents that their son would minister in the spirit and power of Elijah (Luke 1:17). Yet John denied that he was Elijah (John 1:21-23). Jesus said that John would have been the Elijah who was to come if the people of his day had accepted Jesus as their Messiah (Matt. 11:14). Since they did not, John did not fulfill this prophecy about Elijah coming, though he did fulfill the prophecy about Messiah’s forerunner (3:1).

    • This interpretation has in its favor Jesus’ words following the Transfiguration, which occurred after John the Baptist’s death. Jesus said that Elijah would come and restore all things (Matt. 17:11). Whether the original Elijah will appear before the day of the Lord or whether an Elijah-like figure, similar to John the Baptist, will appear remains to be seen. Since Jesus went on to say that Elijah had come and the Jews failed to recognize him, speaking of John (Matt. 17:12-13), I prefer the view that an Elijah-like person will come.

    • What John did for Jesus at His first coming, preparing the hearts of people to receive Him, this latter-day Elijah will do for Him at His second coming.  Evidently the two witnesses in the Tribulation will carry out this ministry (Rev. 11:1-13). Who the witnesses will be is a mystery. Evidently one of them will be an Elijah-like person. These men will do miracles as Elijah and Elisha did.

  • At any rate, the primary Elijah must not be John the Baptist because we haven’t seen this great and awesome day of the Lord (judgment day).
  • Turning the hearts of the fathers… possibly meaning literally that fathers and children throughout the land would have their hearts turned to each other.?? (seems unlikely). One commentator thinks it is meant turning the hearts of the children to the father’s mentioned throughout Malachi (Levi, Moses, Elijah), but I’m not sure how that works with turning the father’s hearts to their children?? Or you could take the interpretation of the NET Bible interpreters: He will encourage fathers and their children to return to me.
  • Curse/decree of utter destruction.
    • This is the idea of something “devoted to destruction” (KJV often uses that wording for H2764). Definition and occurrences.  Examples:
      • Leviticus 27:24
      • Joshua 6:17
      • 1 Samuel 15:21
      • Malachi 4 uses remarkably similar language to 2 Peter 3.  This helps me think this is still future.  At any rate, it brings out some key lessons for us.
      • Here a couple takeaways I see:
        • This idea of doing what we know already (e.g. the Mosaic law for OT believers). God has revealed his will to us in Scripture…we are also waiting to see our redemption. We must faithfully continue in what we know to do until He arrives to settle right and wrong forever.
        • The power of that day of judgment will either burn us like stubble or make us grow like the sun’s rays.
        • 2 Peter 3 says two things (at least). That we should not forget that judgment will surely come (even when it looks like everything is continuing as in the past).  Then, in view of this coming judgment, we should be diligent to be found by him without spot or blemish, and at peace. (2 Peter 3:14)

Matthew 1:18-2:12 Study Guide

Posted Posted in Sunday School

Intro

Do you ever wonder what the point is of studying the birth of Christ?  I think we do know instinctively that there is a lot of significance, and key theology, if you will, tied up in the birth of Christ into the world as a man.  I think for me, Christmas has become so routine that I struggle to find the significance in it.

An interesting feature of this passage is that it comes from one of the four gospels.   I find it tempting to read the four gospels, or at least the 3 synoptics almost interchangeably, and forget that the Holy Spirit inspired each one individually for a divine purpose.  Remembering that helps me keep my focus as I study a passage like this that is so familiar it has become common.

  • In light of that, do you know who Matthew’s primary audience probably was?
    • The 1st century Jews
  • This raises what I think is a significant question: What questions/criticisms would a 1st century Jew have about Jesus? I think his pedigree was crucial to his claim to be the Messiah. Without  properly answering this question, Matthew/Jesus could not hope to convince any self-respecting Jews of the day.  Think about the following:
    • Matthew and Luke were the only NT writers who recorded Jesus’ lineage
    • Many Jews were willing to (grudgingly?) call Jesus a Rabbi, but his claims to be Messiah/son of God was much harder to accept
    • Nazarites (people from Jesus’ hometown): Is this not the son of Joseph, and are not his brothers and sisters here?
    • Some called (or at least implied that) Jesus is an illegitimate son (John 6 or so)
    • Was Jesus of born in Bethlehem, not of Nazareth? In other words, does he fit the prophecies about the Messiah?
    • Did the religious elite accept him?
  • Another related question: who/what did Matthew claim that Jesus is? Hint: read Matthew 1:1 (1 The book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham).  This is interesting because I think today’s lesson is basically giving evidence for those claims.
    • Jesus is a form of Joshua, used for two other people in the Bible. It literally means salvation.  You can see this reflected in Matthew 1:21.
    • Christ: I have recently become more aware of the actual significance of that term.  It is a transliteration of Messiah, but Messiah is also a transliteration.
      • Finny Kuruvilla: A Provocative case has been made that by the time of the first century, the term Christ would have been widely understood as King , or more fully, God’s anointed King.
      • Messiah literally means rub with oil.
      • David was called messiah (Ps 18:50), in other words, God’s King.
      • It really adds some depth to Jesus’ claims when you start substituting the word King for Christ in the NT.  Why else would Jesus spend so much time speaking of his KINGDOM?
    • Son of David, son of Abraham: I think Matthew is further confirming that Jesus is the fulfilment of prophecy of the Messiah (son of David), and the seed of Abraham that would be for blessing all nations.
  • I think these themes are what you see in today’s lesson.   I would like to entitle this passage, The King’s Birth.

Text

Now the birth of [King] Jesus took place this way… (Matthew 1:18)

  • I think it’s significant that Matthew keeps using Jesus’ title of royalty (Christ).
  • Luke tells the story of Jesus’ conception from Mary’s point of view since he is more concerned with an orderly telling of the story. However, Matthew focuses on what Joseph’s side of the story since that is what is most significant to his audience.
  • What is the significance of Matthew 1:18 before they came together she was found to be with child from the Holy Spirit and Matthew 1:25 but knew her not until she had given birth to a son?
    • It establishes that Joseph is definitely not Jesus’ biological father, but rather that He is the Son of God.
    • An incredible amount of ink has been spilled on reconciling this idea of God becoming incarnate, that is God becoming man.  I am pretty uncomfortable with many of these explanations.  I would much rather stick to the details that are given explicitly in Scripture, such as that Jesus is both the son of God and the son of Mary (mankind).
    • Seriously, what is the implications of knowing that Jesus is God incarnate?
      • Jesus is the Word of God. In other words, he is God literally revealed to us.  He showed us how we could live.
      • This was the only way for the curse of sin to be lifted (to save his people from their sins).
      • He showed that his creation is still good since he was willing to take on humanness.
  • What was the content of the reassurance the angel gave Joseph in the dream about taking Mary as his wife (Matthew 1:20-23)?
    • The child was from the Holy Spirit, not from fornication on Mary’s part.
    • The name for the child–this defined who the child would be (Jesus–savior–because he would be a savior).
    • Jesus’ birth to Joseph’s virgin fiancé was a direct fulfillment of prophecy.
  • Joseph’s character: Joseph is shown to be a just, disciplined and obedient father.

Visitors to the King (2:1-12)

  • Why did Matthew include the story of the visit of the wise men, especially the details of locating him (Jerusalem)? Luke, the other gospel writer who recorded Jesus’ birth, used totally different details for his account.
  • What did the Magi (the Greek word) call Jesus when they approached Herod?
    • He who has been born King of the Jews [emphasis mine]
  • What was the Magi’s stated reason for coming to visit Jesus? Related, why would they have given gifts, perhaps in particular the gifts they chose?
    • They came to worship the King.  Interesting that although Jesus was the King of the Jews, they had come from another land to worship someone who was “not” their king.  Shockingly, the religious elite failed to even follow up on this claim.  They had surely also seen the star.
    • The gifts, at the least, were intended to be gifts you would give royalty (perhaps there was individual significance to the gifts, as well, but that is more likely to be hypothetical).
  • Interesting tidbit: Magi were reportedly a sleazy group of people…
  • Why was Herod and Jerusalem troubled about the report that there is a King of the Jews?
    • I used to think Herod was just being crazy to care so much about Jesus, but I am beginning to think he had legitimate reason to be threatened.  This added significance to Jesus’ claim to be the Christ (King).
    • The Honeybrook Nativity scene pointed out that Jerusalem was troubled because they knew blood would be shed over this (it was).
  • Why did Matthew use the chief priests and scribes to speak the prophecy of where the ruler/Christ would be born?
    • I think Matthew is showing that even the religious elite were, in a backhanded way, acknowledging that Jesus met the requirements of this prophecy of where the ruler would be born.

Practical application

  • To me, there are two major takeaways.  The first, the implications of the incarnation of God, we already spoke of.
  • The other thing I find significant is this issue of how we should respond to a king. In this case, the king absolutely has jurisdiction over our lives. If we do not choose to recognize that now, at some point, God has made it clear that he will cause every knee to bow to Jesus (Philippians 2:9-11).
  • This passage reveals three responses to King Jesus:
    • Reaction (being threatened): Herod
    • Indifference/head knowledge but no accompanying respect: religious elite.
      • We are probably most vulnerable to this response
    • Worship: Magi.
  • What do you choose?